Reply to comment

When you said you tried to talk to me in order to minimize damages you're not saying the truth.

During the day we talked and (again) you agreed to take over the CEO seat and to have all of Bob Perry's SLC owner shares transferred in your name.

As far as we knew, we were set. That's why we reopened SLC trading. Hours later, a major non-owner shareholder warned me that you told him you was going to bail out and that you was gonna deal only with "original MDS shareholders".

That's why I IMed you and I said you was doing the wrong thing. I never said you had to pay SLC shareholders, since nobody was asking you money. You had just to run the company after Bob Perry leaving. It was our intention to work with you in order to assess the situation and see what could be done.

You refused to listen and you wanted out. This is the story.

While you're at it, you may think about the people who bought into SLC when we reopened trading because you accepted to takeover the CEO seat.

Just a little note. You claim to have been a "silent owner". If you wanted to be an owner you shouldn't have sold every single share we could not lock and anyway being silent when one is responsible for people money it's not a good thing.

Samantha Goldflake
Vstex Communication and Public Relations Dept.
http://www.vstex.net
(IM me inworld for contacts)